11 Storage Formats for Data Engineers
How to leverage storage formats for efficient and scalable data systems
In Data Engineering, the choice of storage format is a foundational decision that influences the efficiency, scalability, and overall cost-effectiveness of a system. Storage formats are the backbone of how data is ingested, processed, stored, and queried. By understanding the strengths and limitations of each format, Data Engineers can design systems that meet current demands and scale seamlessly as data grows in complexity and volume.
In this post, we explore 11 key storage formats, their principles, and practical applications, simplifying to choose the right format.
1. Row-Based Storage
Purpose: Optimised for transactional systems where entire rows are frequently accessed.
Method: Stores data row by row in sequential order.
Benefits:
Ideal for OLTP workloads.
Simple and intuitive.
Limitations:
Less efficient for analytical queries.
Increased storage size for repeated values.
Examples: MySQL, PostgreSQL.
2. Columnar Storage
Purpose: Designed for analytical workloads involving aggregations and filtering.
Method: Stores data column by column, enabling faster reads for specific columns.
Benefits:
Excellent for OLAP systems.
Highly compressible and query-efficient.
Limitations:
Slower for insert/update operations.
Examples: Apache Parquet, ORC, Amazon Redshift.
3. Key-Value Storage
Purpose: Stores data as key-value pairs, optimised for quick lookups and scalable architectures.
Method: Associates unique keys with corresponding values.
Benefits:
Simple and highly scalable.
Efficient for caching and session management.
Limitations:
Not suited for complex queries.
Examples: Redis, DynamoDB.
4. Document-Oriented Storage
Purpose: Stores semi-structured data in a flexible, schema-less manner.
Method: Data is saved as documents, often in JSON or BSON formats.
Benefits:
Supports nested data and dynamic schemas.
Easy to scale horizontally.
Limitations:
Limited support for complex relationships.
Examples: MongoDB, CouchDB.
5. Graph Storage
Purpose: Designed for relationship-driven data and graph-based queries.
Method: Stores data as nodes, edges, and properties to represent relationships.
Benefits:
Optimised for connected data (e.g., social networks).
Intuitive querying of relationships.
Limitations:
Can be complex to model and scale.
Examples: Neo4j, Amazon Neptune.
6. Time-Series Storage
Purpose: Specialised in chronological data and time-series analysis.
Method: Optimised for timestamp-based indexing and querying.
Benefits:
Highly efficient for time-stamped data.
Supports downsampling and summarisation.
Limitations:
Limited for non-time-series workloads.
Examples: InfluxDB, Prometheus.
7. Object Storage
Purpose: Stores unstructured data like files, images, and videos.
Method: Organises data as objects with metadata and unique identifiers.
Benefits:
Highly scalable and cost-efficient.
Ideal for backups and media storage.
Limitations:
Not optimised for frequent small updates.
Examples: Amazon S3, Google Cloud Storage, Azure Blob Storage.
8. Distributed File System
Purpose: Manages files across multiple nodes for fault tolerance and scalability.
Method: Divides data into chunks and replicates them across nodes.
Benefits:
Ensures high availability.
Handles massive data volumes.
Limitations:
Overhead in coordination and replication.
Examples: HDFS, Lustre.
9. In-Memory Storage
Purpose: Stores data in RAM for ultra-fast processing.
Method: Temporarily holds data in memory for real-time applications.
Benefits:
Extremely low latency.
Ideal for caching and session stores.
Limitations:
Limited by memory size and non-persistent by default.
Examples: Apache Ignite, Cache Memory.
10. Wide-Column Storage
Purpose: Combines columnar and key-value storage for massive scalability.
Method: Organises data into tables with rows and dynamic columns.
Benefits:
Scales well for distributed systems.
Optimised for sparse datasets.
Limitations:
Limited support for complex relationships.
Examples: Cassandra, HBase.
11. Hybrid Storage
Purpose: Combines features of multiple storage types to handle diverse workloads.
Method: Uses tiered storage (e.g., SSDs, HDDs, and memory) based on data access patterns.
Benefits:
Balances cost, performance, and scalability.
Adapts to varying workloads.
Limitations:
Requires careful configuration and management.
Examples: Snowflake, Databricks Lakehouse.
Choosing the Right Storage Format
Picking the right storage format means finding the best match between your workload needs and system capabilities. Here are some tips to help you decide:
Understand Your Workload Type:
For tasks like banking or inventory systems, use row-based storage as it’s good for handling transactions.
For tasks like business reporting or data analysis, columnar storage works best.
Think About Data Structure:
Use document-oriented storage for data that doesn’t fit neatly into tables, like JSON files.
Use key-value storage for simple lookups, where each item has a unique key and value.
Focus on Query Patterns:
For finding relationships (e.g., in social networks), choose graph storage.
For data tied to specific times (e.g., IoT readings), use time-series storage.
Consider Scalability and Performance:
For growing datasets or systems that need to spread data across many servers, use wide-column storage or distributed file system.
Use hybrid storage when you need a balance between cost, speed, and flexibility.
Factor in Speed Needs:
For real-time tasks (e.g., recommendations), use in-memory storage for quick access.
For data that is rarely used or stored long-term, use object storage.
Weigh Cost vs. Simplicity:
Hybrid storage can save money but may take more effort to set up.
For smaller tasks, simpler options like key-value storage might be enough.
Match Storage to Data Type:
Use object storage for files like videos and images.
Use columnar storage for data organised in tables.
Plan for the Future:
Consider how your data might change—formats like document-oriented storage and wide-column storage handle changes well.
If you need to combine transactions and analysis, hybrid storage (e.g., Snowflake) can handle both.
Tip: Start by mapping your data’s lifecycle and usage patterns. Combine this with your scalability, performance, and budget constraints to select the most appropriate format.
Conclusion
A well-chosen storage format is foundational to building efficient, scalable, and cost-effective systems. By aligning storage formats with workload requirements, data engineers can ensure optimal performance and business value.
Which storage format have you worked with? What has your experience been like? Share your insights with the community so we can learn and grow together!
If you found this post helpful, you might also enjoy these:
We Value Your Experience
What storage formats have you relied on in your projects? Share your thoughts below!
Wow what a clarity in this newsletter! This is how every newsletter should have. Illustrations, benefits, etc everything in one place. This is gold